[udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

[Jesse Eichar]

I wouldn't stress too much about the test plugins though

On 9-May-08, at 4:42 PM, andrea antonello wrote:

> Alright, some problems left over are:
>
> Some plugins have the following problem, which is easy to solve, but I
> am wondering why that happens:
>
> Plug-ins declaring extensions or extension points must set the
> singleton directive to
> true	MANIFEST.MF	net.refractions.udig.catalog.tests.geotiff/META-INF	 
> line
> 4	Plug-in Problem
>
>
> Some plugins give trouble on the junit version, some want 3.8.2 and
> some 4 somthing. However I was playing with the ganymede version of
> the ide, targeting the old udig sdk, so I could be doing something
> strange... should not be though.
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Jesse Eichar <jeichar.w at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> I had this problem too.  It is not naming it M0 for some reason it  
>> is some
>> timestamped jar.  Quick fix is to remove the geoapi jar from the  
>> Runtime in
>> the manifest and add the downloaded one.
>>
>>
>> On 9-May-08, at 3:21 PM, andrea antonello wrote:
>>
>>> Alright, my hell on earth is here again :)
>>> I am just wondring why I am the only one not able to build udig  
>>> trunc
>>> (please do not answer on this :)).
>>>
>>> However:
>>> The libs are not downloaded properly.
>>>
>>> net.refractions.udig.libs/lib/geoapi-2.2-M0.jar stais in the lib
>>> folder and is not added to the classpath.
>>>
>>> I completely miss junit and org.eclipse.xsd jars. Where should they
>>> come from? In the refresh.xml (which in the docu is called  
>>> copy.xml?)
>>> I see:
>>> <!-- skip these - they are already accounted for by plug-in  
>>> dependencies
>>> -->
>>>                       <dependency groupId="ant" artifactId="ant- 
>>> optional"
>>> version="1.5.1"
>>> scope="provided" />
>>>                       <dependency groupId="org.apache"
>>> artifactId="xerces"
>>> version="2.7.1" scope="provided" />
>>>               <dependency groupId="xerces" artifactId="xercesImpl"
>>> version="2.7.1" scope="provided" />
>>>                       <dependency groupId="org.eclipse.xsd"
>>> artifactId="xsd"
>>> version="2.2.2" scope="provided" />
>>>                       <dependency groupId="org.eclipse.emf"
>>> artifactId="ecore"
>>> version="2.2.2" scope="provided" />
>>>                       <dependency groupId="junit" artifactId="junit"
>>> version="3.8.1"
>>> scope="provided" />
>>>                       <dependency groupId="velocity"
>>> artifactId="velocity" version="1.4"
>>> scope="provided" />
>>>
>>>
>>> Any hint?
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, andrea antonello
>>> <andrea.antonello at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jody, Simone,
>>>> I'm sure interested to test the trunc!
>>>> Just sorry for the delay, I've been on a fieldtrip (with the
>>>> GPS-enebled udig, which rocks!!), so I wasn't available yesterday.
>>>>
>>>> I think I can take today to do some build and first testing, and  
>>>> then
>>>> pass it to Silvia (see is mad in testing and finding bugs :)).
>>>>
>>>> Simone, we are veeery interested in the rasterstyle stuff, and be  
>>>> sure
>>>> we will come back on that. If we step to trunc, we also will for  
>>>> sure
>>>> bring the style guis from the grass stuff to trunc.
>>>>
>>>> Ciao
>>>> Andrea
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Jody Garnett <jgarnett at refractions.net 
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi again Andrea; I have confirmed that this tag works and is  
>>>>> picking up
>>>>> versions of geoapi and geotools that are fixed and unchanging.  
>>>>> Did you
>>>>> still
>>>>> have time to evaluate trunk?
>>>>> Jody
>>>>>
>>>>> Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I have a udig trunk tagged and ready for your  
>>>>>> amusement...
>>>>>> - GeoAPI tagged and deployed into maven as geoapi-2.2-M0
>>>>>> - GeoTools tagged and deployed into maven as gt-api-2.5-M2  
>>>>>> etc... I
>>>>>> think
>>>>>> I may upload this to source forge as well?
>>>>>> - uDig 1.2-M0 tagged; please check out and build this release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The build instructions are here:
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/ADMIN/02+Development+Environment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tag is here:
>>>>>> - http://svn.geotools.org/udig/tags/1.2-M0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I would like out of this process is a "hit list" of things  
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> fixing on trunk that are important to you. The GeoTools 2.5.x  
>>>>>> series on
>>>>>> which this work is based is going to be wrapped up in the next  
>>>>>> couple
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> months; GeoServer is "happy" with the result for the moment and  
>>>>>> will be
>>>>>> using it as the basis for their 1.7 release; as part of that  
>>>>>> count down
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> will be looking at several performance regressions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One thing that was not mentioned in our earlier discussion; was  
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> short
>>>>>> term need for a RasterSymbolizer editor. I really want to  
>>>>>> exercise
>>>>>> Simone's
>>>>>> recent work :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Jody
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>>>>>> http://udig.refractions.net
>>>>>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>>> http://udig.refractions.net
>>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> http://udig.refractions.net
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel