[udig-devel] Re: Fork of BufferBuilder, and ProgressListener

[Mauricio Pazos]

On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> > Hi Jody: thank for the news. Doing coder review I realized that the
> > buffer implementation does not take into account maintenance problems. I
> > think we have to improve this implementation to allow the easy evolution.
> >
> > I will register this improvement.
>
> I Mauricio; let me grab this old thread with an "update", rather than
> move the modified buffer code to udig, geotools or anywhere else I am
> going to prep a patch for
> Martin and have this functionality made available for JTS 1.9.1.
>
> Just thought I should let you know where this is going; when JTS 1.9.1
> is released you should no longer need your fork of BufferBuilder.
>
> Cheers,
> Jody
Good news! I am working in new functionalities I will wait JTS 1.9 to refactor

thanks
-- 
Mauricio Pazos