[udig-devel] WFS using an EPSG code unknown to uDig 1.1
Janis Viklis
janis at kartes.lv
Tue Oct 9 07:44:01 PDT 2007
I don't know the "right" EPSG code. Our projection is EPSG:3059, but
with only difference in
"PARAMETER["false_northing", -6000000.0]"
ours is: "PARAMETER["false_northing", 0.0]"
the point is , that theoretically the correct representation is without
those -6000000 meters
(which means pretending, that equator is moved 6000000 meters away from
real location)
--
Janis Viklis
IT department director
"Jana seta map publishers"
http://www.kartes.lv
Tel.: +371 6 7317540
Fax.: +371 6 7317541
Mob.: +371 2 9127952
mailto:janis at kartes.lv
skype:janisviklis
Jesse Eichar wrote:
> I will update the epsg authority with this information so that the
> next version will be able to handle this case correctly. What was the
> EPSG code again?
>
> Jesse
>
> On Oct 6, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Janis Viklis wrote:
>
>> so, is there some solution, to set the right projection for WFS, if I
>> have this .prj file?
>> Or to open "jel_ielas_9shp" directly from PostGIS? (the same results
>> for now..)
>>
>> But if I import the "jel_ielas_9.shp" shapefile directly in uDIG - it
>> renders the picture..
>>
>> Projection data shown at Custom projection tab in uDIG is such:
>>
>> PROJCS["LKS_92",
>> GEOGCS["GCS_GRS_1980",
>> DATUM["D_GRS_1980",
>> SPHEROID["GRS_1980", 6378137.0, 298.257222101]],
>> PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0],
>> UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
>> AXIS["Lon", EAST],
>> AXIS["Lat", NORTH]],
>> PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],
>> PARAMETER["central_meridian", 24.0],
>> PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin", 0.0],
>> PARAMETER["scale_factor", 0.9996],
>> PARAMETER["false_easting", 500000.0],
>> PARAMETER["false_northing", 0.0],
>> UNIT["m", 1.0],
>> AXIS["x", EAST],
>> AXIS["y", NORTH]]
>>
>> --
>> Janis Viklis
>> IT department director
>> "Jana seta map publishers"
>> http://www.kartes.lv
>> Tel.: +371 6 7317540
>> Fax.: +371 6 7317541
>> Mob.: +371 2 9127952
>> mailto:janis at kartes.lv
>> skype:janisviklis
>>
>>
>> Janis Viklis wrote:
>>> In this case, "100004" is just manually entered EPSG number in
>>> Geoserver's epsg.properties.
>>> But that projection definition, which corresponds to 100004 in my
>>> case, was taken from the .prj file, I attached earlier.
>>>
>>> In reality, the projection is LKS92. But I don't know, why uDig does
>>> not "understand it". So did also the geoserver, so I added it by the
>>> hand (with the help from Justin Deoliveira).
>>>
>>> In uDIG, there is two types of LKS92 in the list.. but setting them,
>>> does not helps..
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> http://udig.refractions.net
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
More information about the udig-devel
mailing list