[udig-devel] Question on GML in uDig
Jody Garnett
jgarnett at refractions.net
Mon Jul 10 01:03:08 PDT 2006
Jesse Eichar wrote:
> I suppose I should point out that the current implementation has only
> been tested with simple documents. More complex documents especially
> ones with references may cause problems with the current version. In
> addition GML is not a very efficient format so I'd suggest importing
> GML documents then saving them as Shapefile and using the shapefile
> for viewing.
From that you can note that the GML support is fixed at GML2 and
supports only a simple feature model. Still the range of content
is more expressive then that of Shapefile, so you may need to export the
content out to something more capable like PostGIS.
> Finally, the GML is currently read-only.
> Jesse
Thanks for the update Jesse, I was just looking at the module during the
IP check and did not see anything difficult with the
test cases.
Jody
More information about the udig-devel
mailing list