[udig-devel] Question on GML in uDig

Jody Garnett jgarnett at refractions.net
Mon Jul 10 01:03:08 PDT 2006


Jesse Eichar wrote:
> I suppose I should point out that the current implementation has only 
> been tested with simple documents.  More complex documents especially 
> ones with references may cause problems with the current version.  In 
> addition GML is not a very efficient format so I'd suggest importing 
> GML documents then saving them as Shapefile and using the shapefile 
> for viewing.
 From that you can note that the GML support is fixed at GML2 and 
supports only a simple feature model. Still the range of content
is more expressive then that of Shapefile, so you may need to export the 
content out to something more capable like PostGIS.
> Finally, the GML is currently read-only.
> Jesse
Thanks for the update Jesse, I was just looking at the module during the 
IP check and did not see anything difficult with the
test cases.
Jody



More information about the udig-devel mailing list