[udig-devel] Re: ImageIO-GDAL integration
Aleksander Bandelj
aleksander.bandelj at academa.si
Mon Aug 7 02:28:52 PDT 2006
My experience is that ECW decoding is much more expensive than TIFF one.
So, compactness yes, speed no. Fine for a single client, but not so good
for a server ...
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Paul Ramsey ha scritto:
>> I would very much like to see an ECW driver or (even better) a JP2000
>> driver from this project, as such a thing would be widely useful for
>> end users. My priority order would be: JP2000, LAN, ECW, AUX. I
>> assume GeoTIFF is already handled by the existing coverage work? If
>> not, it would go first.
>>
> Well, I second Daniele's choice since, at least here in Italy, you
> either support
> ECW or they'll start laughing at you. Geotiff is so '90s (it has his
> merits, but
> everybody seems to have gone nuts for ECW's speed and compactness).
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
More information about the udig-devel
mailing list