<div>Hi Mateusz,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanx for reply... </div>
<div>The libpqxx code is compiling and linking with my libraries but they are not running ..</div>
<div>it is giving debug assertion memory errors ...</div>
<div>the problem might be due to the struct member alignment of the libpq.dll..!!!???<br> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>can someone help ...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>please ...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanx</div>
<div>sandeep</div>
<div><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mateusz Loskot</b> <<a href="mailto:mateusz@loskot.net">mateusz@loskot.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Markus Schaber wrote:<br>> Hi, Sandeep,<br>><br>> Sandeep Kumar Jakkaraju wrote:<br>><br>>> The problem with libpqxx is that i am unable to call the code from an MS
<br>>> VC ++ 6.0 Library.<br>>> It needs MSVC 7.0 and above !!! i.e .NET and I dont need .NET<br>><br>> So the _real_ problem is that Visual C++ 6.0 is not capable of C++.<br><br>Hi,<br><br>I'd like to share some VC++ related comments.
<br>VC++ 6.0 is a very bad C++ compiler, it does not use modern C++<br>features, provides bad support to templates etc.<br><br>> Btw, AFAIK MSVC 7.0 is still able to compile non-.NET programs...<br><br>There are no problems with compiling
non-.NET source code<br>with any VC++ version.<br>So you can use<br>Visual C++ .NET 2002<br>Visual C++ .NET 2003<br>Visual C++ 2005<br><br>Note, that Microsoft removed '.NET' moniker from the name of<br>Visual C++ 2005 (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_Studio">
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_Studio</a>)<br>as also from names of all Visual Studio 2005 components.<br>The '.NET' moniker was confusing, because users were asking "can I still<br>use C++ language and compile it to native code or only managed code with
<br>.NET is supported."<br><br>The same story is with transition of name of Windows CE platform:<br>Windows CE .NET 4.x to Windows CE 5.0 without .NET in the name.<br><br>So, none of Visual C++ does force users to use .NET framework.
<br><br>Last note, the really good support of ISO C++ starts from Visual C++<br>2003 (internal number of compiler is 7.1).<br><br>Best regards<br>--<br>Mateusz Loskot<br><a href="http://mateusz.loskot.net">http://mateusz.loskot.net
</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>postgis-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net</a><br><a href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users">
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>