<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I've checked out the last version from
the CVS... clean compile... WKB problems no longer occur on AMD64! Everything
works perfectly.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks guys!</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Salutacions - Un Saludo - Regards, <br>
<br>
Carlos Lozano Diez<br>
==============================<br>
Quavantis - mWorld Company <br>
Mobile & Wireless Solutions<br>
<br>
Email: clozano@quavantis.com<br>
Phone: +34 93 4515125<br>
Mobile: +34 678 746275<br>
Web: http://www.quavantis.com<br>
<br>
Office (Spain): <br>
Villarroel 70,
2º 1º<br>
08011 Barcelona<br>
Office (UK):<br>
16-19 Southampton
Place<br>
London, WC2A 2AJ<br>
==============================<br>
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net wrote
on 10/03/2005 20:15:09:<br>
<br>
> The bug is fixed for what I can tell.<br>
> Our "int4" typedef is 8bytes in size :( and this was confusing<br>
> the code. I didn't force int4 to really be 4 bytes ( w/out autoconf<br>
> I wouldn't know how), but making sure int4 vars intended to be<br>
> written-to from the byte stream readers are initalized to zero<br>
> fixes the bug.<br>
> <br>
> Can all reporting guys check this out ?<br>
> It's in current CVS, or - if you feel - this is enough:<br>
> around line 689 in lwgeom/lwgparse.c<br>
> - int4 ret;<br>
> + int4 ret=0;<br>
> <br>
> --strk;<br>
> <br>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:19:52AM -0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > > From: postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net <br>
> > > [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net] On
<br>
> > > Behalf Of strk@refractions.net<br>
> > > Sent: 08 March 2005 18:22<br>
> > > To: PostGIS Development Discussion<br>
> > > Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] WKB Problems on 64-Bit Linux<br>
> > <br>
> > (cut)<br>
> > <br>
> > > Maybe I have completely different problems here. Sorry,
but I <br>
> > > just started building code on the AMD64... <br>
> > > <br>
> > > BTW, were all 0.x working fine ? Could you check 0.9.2 ?<br>
> > > If it is an *old* bug/missupport we might take care of it
for <br>
> > > 1.0.1 ...<br>
> > > <br>
> > > --strk;<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > Hi strk,<br>
> > <br>
> > I've loaded in several very large geometry tables into a database
on AMD64<br>
> > under PostGIS 0.9.1 without any problems, so it's a 1.0.0 issue.<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > Kind regards,<br>
> > <br>
> > Mark.<br>
> > <br>
> > ------------------------<br>
> > WebBased Ltd<br>
> > South West Technology Centre<br>
> > Tamar Science Park<br>
> > Plymouth<br>
> > PL6 8BT <br>
> > <br>
> > T: +44 (0)1752 791021<br>
> > F: +44 (0)1752 791023<br>
> > W: http://www.webbased.co.uk<br>
> > <br>
> > <br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > postgis-devel mailing list<br>
> > postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net<br>
> > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> postgis-devel mailing list<br>
> postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net<br>
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel<br>
</tt></font>